“LloydGeorge once remarked that negotiating with De
Valera was like picking up mercury with a fork.De Valera replied, ‘Why doesn’t he try a spoon?’”
Bernard
Baruch,
The
Public Years
Sunday, May 3, 2020
TELL US YOUR STORY
Tell us your story.... Tell us what happened so far .... Tell us your dreams .... Tell us about your mom and dad and other significant people .... Tell us your surprises..... Tell us your jobs .... Tell us where you lived .... Tell us what you learned .... Tell us the hurts that hurt .... Tell us the hurts and the helps .... Tell us about your blessings ....
Tell us about how you're using your time in this time of the
virus. Watch and listen to this interview of Sidney Poitier. He was born February 20, 1927 and is still alive.
May 3, 2020
GO FIGURE!
TWO FIGURES FOR GOD AND PRIEST
INTRODUCTION
The title of my homily is, “Go Figure!Two Figures for God and Priest.”
TODAY’S READINGS
In today’s readings I noticed the image and metaphor of
sheep and shepherd – in the gospel –in the second reading – and in the Psalm
and Psalm response.
In today’s gospel from John I noticed this sentence:
“Although Jesus used this figure of speech, the Pharisees did not realize what
he was trying to tell them.”
To me - life is about a lot of “Go figuring”.
To me - life is about transfiguration.
To me - life is about discovering who and what our models
are – as we try to figure out life.
To me - life is thinking about what the key models and
metaphors of life are – or ones that grab me and make sense to me.
We are made in image and likeness of God.
Now that’s difficult, so we figure that out with metaphors
and images.
TOM BARRETT STORY – BECOMING A PRIEST
While working with Tom Barrett he once told the story of
why we became a priest.
He was at the OLPH novena at OLPH, Brooklyn – on a
Wednesday – as an altar boy – and while watching one of the Redemptorists
preaching and doing the Novena – he said, “I was following the priest and I
said to myself, ‘I like what he was doing.’Next I said, ‘I would like to do that.’Next I said, ‘I could do that.’Lastly I said, ‘I am going to do that.’”
His story went something like that.
It triggered in me a series of questions.I too was an altar boy at OLPH. Where and
when and why did the idea of becoming a priest someday hit me?Why did I join the vocation club?That meant meeting and studying Latin with
Mr. Paul Peters – using Schultz’s grammar. Was it seeing FathersRudy Egan and Phil Cabasino and other
Redemptorists?
Were they a model on how to do life?
METAPHORS
Yesterday, when working on this homily,when it came to the metaphors and images I
was thinking of – on figuring out what a priest does – the image of priest as
leaving the United States to become a Redemptorist Missionary was significant.
Tom had seen Redemptorists preaching in our parish. I had seen Redemptorist priests
coming into our classroom and telling us about their life in the jungles of
Brazil.That hit me – especially when I
saw a Redemptorist Missionary Vocation brochure.It showed a Redemptorist on a horse. How
about that?Wouldn’t that impact a lot of kids?
I also liked the metaphor of a priest as missionary from The
Field Afar, the Maryknoll magazine.
In the novitiate I read Thunder in the Distance,
the life of Pere Lebbe, the Belgian Vincentian 3 times. He worked as a
missionary in China. I read it again in
Esopus, in our Major Seminary days. It certainly gave me a model and a metaphor
for being a priest.
As I said, “Life is a go figure experience.”
At Esopus – the place of our major seminary - two models
for God hit me.
The first was God
as Good Shepherd. Today’s gospel and today’s Psalm triggered that image for me.
But at Esopus the image of God and Christ as the Good Shepherd didn’t come as
words.It was on the tabernacle door: the Good Shepherd.
That hit me.To me it was the most
central image in that chapel.Being
there for 14 years of my life – 6 years as a seminarian [1960-1966] and 8 years
as a novice master [1985-1993], I saw many contenders for central image in that
chapel.
For many it was the worn step at the OLPH shrine – where
thousands of future Redemptorists knelt to say a prayer.
For many it was the big mural painting over the chapel
door – which would only be seen on the way out.It featured Christ standing there and sending his disciples out into the
whole world.
For me it was Good Shepherd on the tabernacle door– as
model and metaphor for who and what God is.
The second metaphor and model for Christ, for God,
wasreservoir. It was not a painting or
an image – but more an inner image of a big reservoir.
It hit me at Esopus thatthe priest was not only a shepherd – Luke 15 becoming the central
chapter and center of Luke and of Christ- but also a reservoir – so the need to prayto get filled.The chapel, the library, the classroom were
filling me – the trickle of thought and figuring coming into me – slowly and
steadily – thoughts melting in me – thoughts becoming me.
I became clearer about the image of shepherd than the reservoir – my first time at Esopus –
but the reservoir image became me from 1960-66.
Years later, while at Lima, Ohio for 8 ½ years I saw actual
reservoirs. Denis Sweeney introduced me to 3 big reservoirs – but mainly one of
them – a mile around.They were perfect
for walking around them – on top of the big dirt walls that cupped the
water.The path on top was 10 yards wide
at least.Denis would run around it –
and I would walk it.He only beat me
once – in going around the top – 2 times to my one time.
In those many walks – there were lots of weeks – we were
not out on the road – June – Summer – July – August. I drank in the image of
the priest and God as a reservoir.
In my life, I had been by a Lake in Oconomowoc,
Wisconsin, hills in Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania,
the Hudson at Esopus, the ocean at West
End,the main two imageswere still God and the priest as Shepherd and
Reservoir.
One is going out – like the missionaryand one is standing still like the reservoir.
I saw shepherds in Scala, Italy – where I was for a week.
They would come through the tiny town every afternoon. They were the ones whom
St. Alphonsus, our founder, met when he was down on the Amalfi Coast recovering
from an overwork breakdown.I also saw a
shepherd on the road from Jericho up to Jerusalem.
But I got to know shepherds first in my imagination.
That’s also true for reservoir.
TWOTALKSTHAT DEVELOPED THESE TWO IMAGES A BIT DEEPER.
Looking back into my life, “go figuring my life,”yesterday, I thought of two talks in which I
heard speakers talk about these 2 models, metaphors and figures – not my way –
but in a way I tailored for my figuring life out.
One speaker underlined,yellow marked, highlighted the 3 stories in Luke 15.The speaker said in the Good Shepherd story and
the Woman looking for the Lost coin story, God is on the move – searching and
finding.We do that as priest.In the 3rd story, that of the
prodigal son, God waits.
In the second talk, a nun in the Internovitiate Program
at Ossining, New York said there at 2 images in spirituality;the road and the rocking chair.
She said 90 + percent of spiritualities talk about the
road, the way, the path, the ladder, the climb, the steps.Less than 10 percent – especially in Western
Spiritualities, it’s the waiting, the sitting, the rocking chair on the porch.
But there they are: the priest as shepherd on the road looking for
lost sheep and the priest as listener, the wisdom figure, the preacher, the
story teller, sitting there as reservoir – giving cold glasses of cool water to
the thirsty.
I see a retreat house as a reservoir – I spent many years
of my life here at San Alfonso – and St. Alphonsus Retreat house in the Poconos
– Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania.
I see the Redemptorist Missionary as the shepherd –
hitting the road – in search of stray and lost sheep.
God is both shepherd and reservoir.
A priest is both shepherd and reservoir.
CONCLUSION
Go figure what this priest was talking about today.
“Next time you feel a bit under the weather,
give the pills and potions a miss and try reading – or writing – some poetry. That is the advice of doctors who are taking
part in a Bristol University study which shows that sometimes a few lines of
Wordsworth, Keats or Browning can overcome a patient’s need for minor
tranquillisers."
The title of my homily for this 3rd Monday after Easter is,“The Mass: Digesting Food and Words.”
We spend our lives sitting down for breakfast, lunch, supper and snacks and conversations.
We spend our lives taking in food and words.
Then we move away from tables carrying food in our stomachs and conversations in our minds.
We spend our lives digesting both.
The word “digest” – has in it – the word, "gestation" – to carry.
We take in conversations – we take in words – we digest
them – we listen to them – we chew on thoughts – they become us – for and
against.
READINGS
Today’s first reading - Acts 6: 8-15 - has people coming to listen to
Steven – to try to figure what he’s got – and they get stuff that they don’t
get – and they get against him – words and ideas.
Today’s gospel is from John 6. As John McGowan said the
other day: "It's the Eucharistic Chapter."
And we were taught by Father Gene McAlee, this chapter 6 of John has several levels - which kept on growing. A whole
earlier level centered in on wisdom – which becomes the bread of life – once the early
church digested Jesus – once the wisdom became flesh – once the word became
flesh.
We were talking the other day at table and the name John
Corbett came up. He told me somethng very unique: the only reason he was
becoming a Redemptorist was our rule. He read it and it made sense for his
life.
It is a great document – which we need to digest - and
feed upon.
The only reason I becamea Redemptorist was I saw and digested the Redemptorists as akid at O.L.P.H Brooklyn, New York.
The only thing I stayed as a priest was this: I began to see so clearly in the Mass is that it is
a meal.
The only way I get the gospels is that it was put together
in the context of meals
The big thing I have digested about the Redemptorists is our
meals together.
Taste and see.
We eat together.
We drink together.
We digest each other.
We become each other.
If we don’t eat each other up, we leave.
If we don’t digest each other, we don’t become Redemptorists – that is this community , this province,
Taste and see.
The Mass of time called our day – is a meal, a mass of
stuff we digest from table and time together.
Someone said the tongueis forever moving – because the mind is forever moving – taking words, thoughts, deeds, in
through papers, phones, TV, news, talk at table.
Communion with each other - becomes us.
CONCLUSION
Meals and minds together - is how we became who are in our family meals - we digested language - and how to be who were have become.
Life: Becoming us - digesting each other.
Amen.
Monday, April 27, 2020
April 27, 2020
LINGER
Yes, some people linger.
To buy or not to buy the # 4
or the # 6 meal at the fast food
counter. Wait! Maybe I should
get two scoops of ice cream,
butter pecan and rum raisin.
Then I can sit outside and watch
the world go by – slowly.I’ve
been rushing around too fast
lately.Maybe by
just lingering,
so and so will talk toso and so
and I’ll be more at peace with
both of them. Listeningworks
better when we wait for the
other to tell us what’s really
happening. Maybe they know.
Maybe they know why the
other is lingering
– why they
are waiting – and maybe this
virus will bring us some new life as it is really lingering.
Thought for Today: "It's important to remember that everyone has something they are dealing with, whether they are sharing it or not. It helps to be understanding and accommodating."
“Traditional autobiography has generally had a poor press.
The novelist Daphne du Maurier condemned all examples of this literary
form as self-indulgent. Others have quipped
that autobiography reveals nothing bad about the writer except his memory. George Orwell thought that an autobiography
can be trusted only ‘when it reveals something disgraceful.’ His reasons?
‘A man who gives a good account
of himself is probably lying.’ Sam Goldwyn came to this conclusion: ‘I didn’t
think anybody should write his autobiography until after he’s dead.’”
